Supermicro X8ST3

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Supermicro X8ST3 (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X8ST3
Memory	23.5 GB free of 32.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131107
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '21 at 16:03
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 75.8 2-Core 154 63% 105 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 469 48% 387 Pts	64-Core 582 36% 582 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8609) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.9% Poor	Lighting 36.2 Reflection 39.2 Parallax 37.8 30% 37.7 fps	MRender 38.9 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 27.3 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 276GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1127B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 51 66 65 64 68 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33% Below average	Read 190 Write 176 Mixed 169 SusWrite 62.1 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 36.5 4K Mixed 16.8 64% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 19.6 DQ Write 62.1 DQ Mixed 20.5 22% 34.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 547GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 39 45 40 39 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 95.4 Write 72.2 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 41.7 48% 64.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 52GB free Firmware: GKAOA90A SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 39 45 40 39 44 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 45.8 Write 36.5 Mixed 30 SusWrite 41.8 28% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 38%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G7TV0F 1TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 16GB free Firmware: GKAOA90A SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 51 45 45 50 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 44.6 Write 57.9 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 47.6 33% 45.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 39%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 453GB free Firmware: GKAOA90A SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 73 71 66 71 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 60.4 Write 65.7 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 69.5 44% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 37%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G89DAF 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 60GB free Firmware: GKAOA90A SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 38 40 37 38 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 70 Write 54 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 38.4 36% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 44%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB 4,323 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 106GB free Firmware: JP4ONA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 92 91 88 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 91.2 Write 95.8 Mixed 45.1 SusWrite 90.4 59% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 73GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 62 68 65 65 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 66.7 Write 62.7 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 65.5 46% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ANKOWALL ANKOWALL ANKOWALL ANKOWALL Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G MXIC 25L3205 68GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.2% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 9.2 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 10.9 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X8ST3 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Supermicro X8ST3

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	7x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	3x
Core i7 930Intel $149Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
RX 470AMD $126Bench 40%, 94,030 samples	2x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x

SSD
HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GBSSDBench 48%, 4 samples	4x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	2x
Raid 0 Volume 512GBIntelBench 191%, 18,578 samples	1x

RAM
ATMEL 26DF321 48GBUnknownBench 44%, 76 samples	3x
MXIC 25L3205 44GBUnknownBench 33%, 74 samples	3x
ATMEL 26DF321 44GBUnknownBench 31%, 37 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16