TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B85M-D2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D2V  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '21 at 04:25
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 150
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 261
41% 294 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 71.6%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3688) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.2% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 59.5
50% 62 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 52.3
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 49.2%
 Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 215 241 14 16 16 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.7% Poor
Read 136
Write 97.7
Mixed 82
SusWrite 110
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 9.6
39% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 12.5
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 13.7
10% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 24.7%
 Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
882GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 211 211 210 213 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 154
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 210
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 119%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 37%
 Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B85M-D2V Builds (Compare 955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D2V - $94

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples182x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples97x
Core i5-4690Intel  $51Bench 67%, 73,695 samples82x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples82x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples69x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples63x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples67x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples28x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples22x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples31x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples28x
CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GBCrucialBench 30%, 12,839 samples21x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback