Asus X580VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X580VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X580VD
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 17 '21 at 18:59
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 162
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 426
44% 353 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1A10) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 7.7
6% 14.9 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 7
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U512G1002 512GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 235 239 214 96 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 421
Write 320
Mixed 225
SusWrite 191
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 38.6
130% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 197
171% 256 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 97%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
393GB free
Firmware: JU000J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 110 109 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 140
Write 117
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 109
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.6
226% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 24GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X580VD Builds (Compare 1,188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X580VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback