MSI B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B53
MotherboardMSI B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 275
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 840
84% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,012
63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
MSI(1462 7B53) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 9
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 0.2
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 480GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 81 82 82 84 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 258
Write 175
Mixed 241
SusWrite 113
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 15.5
69% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 14.7
DQ Mixed 26
34% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 90%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
639GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 84.7
Write 83.4
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 84.3
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 57%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
230GB free
Firmware: AV001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 97.9
Write 112
Mixed 48
SusWrite 116
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 69%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
63GB free, PID a820
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 157 92 142 159 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 96.9
Write 15.7
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 122
83% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2
142% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 52%
Verbatim USB External SSD 126GB
89GB free, PID 0246
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 159 158 159 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 228
Write 141
Mixed 111
SusWrite 158
202% 159 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.5
81% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 82%
WD A MQ01A External 1TB
875GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 34 39 39 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 34.6
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 37.5
41% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FAD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.3% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 5.7
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53) Builds (Compare 986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53) - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback