MSI B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B53
MotherboardMSI B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '21 at 13:23
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 87
1-Core 125
2-Core 262
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 783
80% 648 Pts
64-Core 952
59% 952 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
MSI(1462 7B53) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 9.2
5% 8.53 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 14.1
9% 9.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 480GB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 261 80 80 82 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 331
Write 152
Mixed 249
SusWrite 141
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 17.4
66% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 26.8
35% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 90%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
646GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 84 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 87
Write 75.9
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 84.2
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 57%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
230GB free
Firmware: AV001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 103 103 105 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 115
Write 112
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 103
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 69%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
61GB free, PID a820, Lexar 128GB
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 96 97 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 146
Write 15.7
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 109
98% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
73% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 52%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 118
Write 24.5
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 18.6
40% 42 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 28%
WD A MQ01A External 1TB
882GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 39 40 40 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 37.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 37
42% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FAD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53) Builds (Compare 984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53) - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $374
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback