Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 11:04
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4350-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 115
58% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 217
28% 214 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 2739) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.53 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV425S264G 64GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C091
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 32 30 25 13 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 202
Write 29.2
Mixed 34
SusWrite 25
16% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 2.9
21% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 25%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
427GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 71 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 70.2
Write 69.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 71.9
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 49%
SanDisk Cruzer Snap 32GB
25GB free, PID 55a5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.4 8.3 8.6 9.3 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 0.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 7.4
9% 7.78 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback