Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1610-$37 5,236 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1610 @ 2.60GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 84.9 1-Core 51 2-Core 125 54% 87 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 120 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 120 8% 120 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$140 4,505 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: LH6i SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 166 153 150 220 167 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 374 Write 250 Mixed 260 SusWrite 169 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 55.5 4K Mixed 31.7 113% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 133 135% 220 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 89%
Kingston SNV425S264G 64GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 19GB free Firmware: C091 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 131 158 159 162 149 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 197 Write 144 Mixed 81.4 SusWrite 153 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 6.2 23% 7.2 MB/s	DQ Read 10.9 DQ Write 11.7 DQ Mixed 7.5 7% 10 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3 1866G 2OZ 1x4GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.9% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 7.9 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	96x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	96x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	70x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	12x
99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 6,486 samples	10x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $424