Gigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 14:58
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 118
51% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 152
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.8.2
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 9.5
4% 6.97 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.2
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
226GB free
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 513 323 327 325 326 326 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1721
Write 1,359
Mixed 867
SusWrite 356
239% 1,076 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 61.2
204% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 577
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 529
384% 502 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 176%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 116 118 116 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 117
Write 109
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 116
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 160GB
33GB free (System drive), PID 2120
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 23 26 26 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 25.2
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 21.4
33% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0- Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XN-WIFI Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI - $118

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $353
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback