QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 12:07
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 220
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 927
79% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,331
82% 1,331 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 189
Parallax 184
144% 183 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 188
Splatting 130
123% 152 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 130%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 512GB
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 986 996 1024 1034 1048 976 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
Red Hat VirtIO 500GB
171GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 358 376 379 380 257 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 66%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 181 176 181 185 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 166
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 181
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 28
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 25.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback