QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '21 at 12:03
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core 25 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 73.7 1-Core 121 2-Core 230 78% 142 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 918 85% 710 Pts	64-Core 1,332 82% 1,332 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 167 Reflection 183 Parallax 189 136% 180 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 176 Splatting 124 116% 144 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 512GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 254GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1008 1052 1041 1070 1054 1036 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
Red Hat VirtIO 500GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 171GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 340 376 378 231 179 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 66%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 177 181 176 182 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 156 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 178 100% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 27.6 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 26.2 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	140x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	74x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16