Acer Aspire V5-132P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-132P  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Angel_CY
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130904
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '21 at 09:35
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1019Y
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Memory 39.1
1-Core 24.9
2-Core 22.4
21% 28.8 Pts
4-Core 23.4
8-Core 23.9
3% 23.6 Pts
64-Core 6.7
0% 6.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 081B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 37 38 38 44 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 28
Write 34.4
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 41.3
23% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 0.5
SC Mixed 1.8
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-132P Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Aspire V5-132P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback