Acer Aspire E1-471

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-471  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA40_HC
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime18.1 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 15:50
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2348M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 87.6
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 79.6
46% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 113
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0718) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 1.44
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 4.04
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OA920
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 43 29 48 49 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 74.7
Write 59.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 41.4
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 7.4
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-471 Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-471

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback