Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Memory 28.9 1-Core 49.7 2-Core 99.4 32% 59.3 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 194 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E63 003E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.08% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 2.4 2% 2.43 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4 3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.08% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 256GB NS550-2242 256GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1206A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 353 302 156 154 145 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 378 Write 323 Mixed 300 SusWrite 238 70% 310 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 63.6 4K Mixed 12.7 75% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 45 88% 175 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 78%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 11GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 10 11 10 11 9.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.52% Terrible	Read 19.9 Write 1.7 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 9.9 10% 9.17 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.52% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 12 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 261 15% 261 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	13x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	13x

SSD
256GB NS550-2242 256GBTeclastBench 54%, 255 samples	9x
SSDPR-S400U-240-80 240GBBench 71%, 100 samples	1x
Sata III 1TBIntensoBench 87%, 92 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	11x
123456789012345678 4x1.5GBABCDBench 24%, 1,884 samples	2x