Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Memory 27.6 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 64.1 26% 44.9 Pts	4-Core 89.8 8-Core 110 13% 99.7 Pts	64-Core 97.7 6% 97.7 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6952 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.64% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.91 1% 0.94 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 0.09 1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.64% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 256GB NS550-2242 256GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0S SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 333 384 363 389 401 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 445 Write 392 Mixed 367 SusWrite 368 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 62.2 4K Mixed 23.1 97% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 42.6 70% 136 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.6 22% 7.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 269 15% 269 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	13x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	13x

SSD
256GB NS550-2242 256GBTeclastBench 54%, 255 samples	9x
SSDPR-S400U-240-80 240GBBench 71%, 100 samples	1x
Sata III 1TBIntensoBench 87%, 92 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	11x
123456789012345678 4x1.5GBABCDBench 24%, 1,884 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16