Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '17 at 00:19
Run Duration394 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 498
57% 446 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
Asus(1043 8385) 1.5GB
CLim: 782 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 43.9
Parallax 32.2
24% 35 fps
MRender 44
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 33
27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 115GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 157
Write 68.3
Mixed 89.7
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 9.76
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 7.11
51% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.2
DQ Write 55.7
DQ Mixed 7
14% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 49%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 135
Write 130
Mixed 90
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.27
4K Write 2.74
4K Mixed 0.36
144% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 76%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Read 6.82
Write 3.1
Mixed 4.05
5% 4.66 MB/s
4K Read 3.39
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
13% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback