Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 06:30
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User BRN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 98
2-Core 215
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 500
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 143E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6089
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.5% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 38.8
24% 32.9 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 53.2
33% 38.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 791 419 420 420 415 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,105
Write 1,632
Mixed 1,141
SusWrite 481
246% 1,090 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.8
192% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 714
540% 727 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 166%
Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-033.A00G Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB
2933, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 18
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 25.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 15,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback