Lenovo 90G9003DMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90G9003DMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 364F
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '21 at 10:20
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-9030 RADEON R2, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 50.4
1-Core 40
2-Core 64.4
33% 51.6 Pts
4-Core 65.3
8-Core 61.9
9% 63.6 Pts
64-Core 65.2
4% 65.2 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Sapphire(174B 0630) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 4.8
3% 4.93 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 106 56 105 47 142 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.5% Below average
Read 158
Write 90.3
Mixed 111
SusWrite 99.1
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 16.1
60% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 36.4
DQ Write 40.3
DQ Mixed 35.8
28% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: GG2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 31 31 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 99.1
Write 59.2
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 30.9
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback