Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-9030 RADEON R2, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G 69 User benchmarks, average bench 32% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 70.4 1-Core 41.2 2-Core 64.6 40% 58.7 Pts	4-Core 63.2 8-Core 61.9 8% 62.6 Pts	64-Core 65.8 4% 65.8 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B 0630) 2GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 6 Parallax 4.6 3% 4.83 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 4.7 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 121 68 109 84 131 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25% Poor	Read 168 Write 85.2 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 104 24% 110 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 8.8 37% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 15.6 DQ Write 16.3 DQ Mixed 14.5 11% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 463GB free Firmware: GG2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 82 94 97 98 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 99.8 Write 89 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 93.5 57% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB 4,338 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.8% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7.2 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16