Performance Results


Gaming 119% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA550
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200604
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '21 at 16:01
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 91.9 1-Core 137 2-Core 260 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 660 68% 549 Pts	64-Core 875 54% 875 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2011) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.99% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 155 Parallax 8.7 5% 56.6 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 11.6 8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.99% Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	139% Outstanding	Lighting 203 Reflection 188 Parallax 197 165% 196 fps	MRender 167 Gravity 146 Splatting 126 118% 146 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D512 512GB 2,452 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: CQ20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 333 321 359 340 345 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 1,449 Write 237 Mixed 367 SusWrite 337 130% 598 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 96.4 4K Mixed 49 174% 61.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,188 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 371 370% 621 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 234%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120 24,278 User benchmarks, average bench 287% 865GB free Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1905 1841 1908 1849 1896 1887 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	313% Outstanding	Read 1,877 Write 2,100 Mixed 1,339 SusWrite 1881 406% 1,799 MB/s	4K Read 50.7 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 67.5 227% 79.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,305 DQ Write 1,085 DQ Mixed 1159 878% 1,183 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 313% Great: 370%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF4G64HZ-3G2B2 1x31GB 177 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 14.5 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 16.1 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	2,026x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	849x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples	564x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	490x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	425x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	410x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	165x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	1,058x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	255x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	223x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16