MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '21 at 14:59
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 71.7
1-Core 149
2-Core 295
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 978
92% 763 Pts
64-Core 1,409
87% 1,409 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 704 607 600 598 582 570 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,468
Write 2,126
Mixed 1,568
SusWrite 610
377% 1,693 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 85.8
284% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,161
DQ Write 732
DQ Mixed 938
701% 944 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 267%
Great: 340%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
540GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 61 63 63 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 56.7
Write 64.5
Mixed 58
SusWrite 61.9
45% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,006
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback