MSI MS-179C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GP72MVR 7RGX
MotherboardMSI MS-179C  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180212
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 13:09
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 225
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 586
58% 474 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11DE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6140
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79% Very good
Lighting 95.9
Reflection 170
Parallax 95.8
78% 120 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 104
81% 97.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 301 248 228 214 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 470
Mixed 374
SusWrite 259
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 57.6
191% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
662GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 426 427 452 429 395 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 443
Write 396
Mixed 345
SusWrite 423
297% 402 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 38.4
6,918% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 288
2,834% 331 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7D8MB-16 859B BLS16G4S240FSD.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 24.7
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 26.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-179C Builds (Compare 499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MS-179C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback