MSI MS-179C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GP72MVR 7RGX
MotherboardMSI MS-179C  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180212
Uptime8 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 12:18
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 218
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 586
58% 476 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11DE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6089
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 177
Parallax 110
83% 130 fps
MRender 99.3
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 108
84% 102 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 265 276 285 283 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 476
Write 342
Mixed 331
SusWrite 281
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 31.1
122% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 48.5
DQ Mixed 162
131% 195 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 116%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
673GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 386 400 406 397 379 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 482
Write 413
Mixed 335
SusWrite 386
298% 404 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 35.5
6,232% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 303
2,823% 313 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7D8MB-16 859B BLS16G4S240FSD.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 24.7
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-179C Builds (Compare 499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MS-179C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback