Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 07:47
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 96.7
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 170
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 506
49% 402 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Palit(1569 2204) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1
Parallax 1
1% 1 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 236 144 170 184 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 393
Write 392
Mixed 325
SusWrite 202
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 33.2
118% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 165
169% 275 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
441GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 157 161 162 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 130
Write 125
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 161
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
378% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991997 (996997) 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 23.4
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback