Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '21 at 18:52
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 96.9
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 180
75% 125 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 503
49% 405 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Palit(1569 2204) ≥ 4GB; palit
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1
Parallax 1
1% 1 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 272 184 209 178 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 406
Write 386
Mixed 330
SusWrite 222
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 32.9
115% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 192
182% 284 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
441GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 163 160 163 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 69.5
Write 86.6
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 163
64% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.5
439% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991997 (996997) 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 24.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 50.8
79% 50.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback