bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '21 at 01:04
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 57
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 143
50% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 555
44% 387 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K160Q
Nvidia(10DE 113B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 370.41
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 3.9
4% 4.33 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 4.3
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 58.8
Write 2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 0.2
12% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
71% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17%
Great: 91%
Vmware Virtual disk 2GB
1GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 7.8 9 8.7 9.5 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
Read 168
Write 3.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 8.5
34% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.2% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 27.4
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.1
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback