Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Predator PH315-53 (all builds)
Motherboard	CML QX50_CMS
Memory	16.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200828
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '21 at 08:53
Run Duration	284 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Memory 88.9 1-Core 129 2-Core 250 87% 156 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 695 71% 574 Pts	64-Core 941 58% 941 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1441) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 86.9 Parallax 7.6 5% 33.5 fps	MRender 7.6 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 10.6 7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00007 1TB 2,588 User benchmarks, average bench 261% 885GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7202Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1339 1766 1514 1501 1390 1525 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 1,730 Write 2,118 Mixed 1,504 SusWrite 1,506 387% 1,714 MB/s	4K Read 47.7 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 55.8 190% 63.7 MB/s	DQ Read 875 DQ Write 608 DQ Mixed 721 544% 735 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 371%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB 4,338 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 26GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 109 Write 87.6 Mixed 72.1 110% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 0.8 273% 3 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 62%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 91 91 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 90.2 Write 91.4 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 92.1 114% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.6 232% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 59%
SABRENT DISK00 1TB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 931GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 94 97 96 97 94 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 134 Write 150 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 88.6 126% 98 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 35% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 209%
SABRENT DISK01 256GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 157% 238GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 145 147 147 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 380 Write 373 Mixed 303 SusWrite 150 395% 301 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 19.8 1,582% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 18.3 DQ Write 25.9 DQ Mixed 21 1,663% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 168%
SABRENT DISK02 1TB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 913GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 145 148 146 147 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	50% Average	Read 110 Write 144 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 146 142% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 38% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 200%
SABRENT DISK03 1TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 931GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 94 97 96 97 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 89.8 Write 10.7 Mixed 42.2 SusWrite 88.6 72% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 191%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE M471A2K43DB1-CWE 24GB 114 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.9% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 15.4 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 15.9 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	4,186x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	1,010x
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	867x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	3,007x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	1,148x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	814x

SSD
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 179%, 2,900 samples	989x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1014 1TBWDCBench 219%, 2,501 samples	632x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1014 256GBWDCBench 153%, 1,070 samples	544x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	1,921x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 49%, 13,312 samples	552x
HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 1x16GBHynixBench 45%, 4,229 samples	537x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369