| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140407 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 08 '21 at 05:55 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.7%
Good
|
61% 102 Pts
|
44% 354 Pts
|
25% 401 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
|
34.3%
Below average
|
37% 42.4 fps
|
29% 36.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 413 429 431 432 426 MB/s
|
97.8%
Outstanding
|
98% 434 MB/s
|
138% 47.7 MB/s
|
178% 244 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 168 171 167 169 166 MB/s
|
95.2%
Outstanding
|
104% 142 MB/s
|
224% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GBH2X04E99927-15 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.7%
Poor
|
28% 9.7 GB/s
|
25% 8.77 GB/s
|
49% 81.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 567x |
| FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 138x |
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 80x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 67x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 60x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $606 |