Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '16 at 06:07
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 224
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 570
57% 464 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84B8) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 14
Parallax 13
15% 15 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 15
Splatting 16.3
14% 18.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 475
Write 291
Mixed 245
74% 337 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 18.4
99% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 41.2
90% 189 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBH2X04E99927-15 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback