Dell Vostro 230

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemDell Vostro 230  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 07N90W
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '17 at 04:59
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5800-$58
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 90.9
44% 69.3 Pts
4-Core 90.5
8-Core 90.4
12% 90.4 Pts
64-Core 91.4
6% 91.4 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
MSI(1462 8A9E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 373.6
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
8.07% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 9.78
8% 9.23 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 11.7
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.07%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500AVVS-61L2B0 250GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 97.6
Mixed 24.2
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.28
92% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 35%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
148GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 98.1
Mixed 27.3
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.43
98% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vostro 230 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback