Asus G11CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G11CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G11CD
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 10:37
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 85.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 621
68% 538 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8678) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 40.8
Reflection 45.7
Parallax 41.1
33% 42.5 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 35.9
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 114 193 201 192 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 414
Write 370
Mixed 288
SusWrite 196
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 12.4
61% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 32.5
45% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 61%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$27
665GB free
Firmware: A7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 135 142 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 155
Write 148
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 142
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 107%
Intenso External USB 3.0 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 143 143 143 162 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 109
Write 138
Mixed 120
SusWrite 147
95% 128 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
357% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 90%
WD Elements 1TB
101GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 37.2
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 12.8
37% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 43%
ASMT 2115 2TB
152GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 38.7
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 17.6
41% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 111%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B0 1TB
386GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.5% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 34.3
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 12.3
36% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G11CD Builds (Compare 2,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Asus G11CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $196
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback