Lenovo 90H1000WUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90H1000WUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3100
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171012
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 03:03
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 222
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 786
70% 591 Pts
64-Core 1,088
67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Device(1642 1727) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1149 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 29.7
17% 25.9 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 20.6
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
819GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 157 166 183 181 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 184
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 171
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 12GB
1200, 1200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.8% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 19.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback