HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory43.7 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 18:14
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 65.9
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 135
54% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 593
52% 444 Pts
64-Core 1,037
64% 1,037 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 47
Parallax 34.2
29% 38.9 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 27.6
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 240 241 240 242 243 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
73.3% Very good
Read 260
Write 249
Mixed 248
SusWrite 242
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 39
126% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 192
145% 194 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
1GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,317
Write 1,131
Mixed 730
235% 1,059 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 46.7
153% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 530
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 492
355% 462 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
293GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 126 132 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 136
Write 129
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 131
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
470GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 92 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 40
Write 18.4
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 91.1
32% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965433-157.A00LF ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-YH9 ID:01 98 9965433-157.A00LF ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-YH9 ID:01 98 9965433-157.A00LF ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-YH9 ID:01 98 9965433-157.A00LF ID:80 ... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55% Above average
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 24.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback