Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '21 at 23:06
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 141
59% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 428
41% 337 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.9% Average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 67
Parallax 77.7
50% 68.7 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 41
41% 51.1 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 388 390 395 405 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 471
Write 401
Mixed 356
SusWrite 390
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 20
100% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 32.3
66% 129 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
792GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 194 196 196 197 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 152
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 196
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 11.8
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 18.7
25% 19 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.4
149% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback