Performance Results


Gaming 107% UFO	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$184 586,670 User benchmarks, average bench 77% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 74.8 1-Core 115 2-Core 227 79% 139 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 715 71% 565 Pts	64-Core 945 63% 945 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808 622,179 User benchmarks, average bench 136% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	139% Outstanding	Lighting 172 Reflection 188 Parallax 180 139% 180 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 180 Splatting 126 140% 147 fps
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 150%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$105 404,139 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 231GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 333 329 313 309 310 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 506 Write 354 Mixed 298 SusWrite 322 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 30.1 114% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 88.7 DQ Mixed 169 140% 210 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$80 67,416 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 1333 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	80% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 26.7 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 23.9 71% 25 GB/s	Latency 90.8 44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

RAM
DDR4 2666 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 82%, 6,616 samples	160x
DDR4 2666 2OZ 1x8GBAdataBench 45%, 3,618 samples	92x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GBCorsair $80Bench 82%, 67,416 samples	23x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $404

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16