Dell OptiPlex 9020M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 9020M
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9020M  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 10:01
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 156
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 313
37% 285 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Dell(1028 0669) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4326
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.9
3% 4.37 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 24 2.6 2.7 200 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 385
Write 222
Mixed 249
SusWrite 67.7
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 16.4
58% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 78.7
DQ Write 40.9
DQ Mixed 43.4
37% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 55%
JMicron Generic DISK00 3TB
140GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 89 91 88 90 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 128
Write 124
Mixed 74
SusWrite 89.9
137% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 71%
JMicron Generic DISK01 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 95 92 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 146
Write 144
Mixed 86
SusWrite 93.7
154% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 57%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
633GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 43 44 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 213
Write 216
Mixed 117
SusWrite 43.8
187% 147 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.7
236% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%
JMicron Generic DISK01 4TB
148GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 43 44 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 154
Write 43.5
Mixed 57
SusWrite 43.5
83% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
51% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 10.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 9020M Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9020M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback