Monster ABRA A5 V13.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V13.2  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180503
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 06:10
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 732
69% 574 Pts
64-Core 871
54% 871 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1042) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 31
Parallax 6.9
5% 14.8 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6005-ac Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 585 640 656 625 594 547 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 444
Mixed 477
SusWrite 608
115% 511 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 48.6
169% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 291
244% 353 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 127%
Great: 153%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 100 103 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 82.3
Write 85.2
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 99.8
109% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 859B CT8G4SFS8266.C8FD1 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 22.7
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 26
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V13.2 Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Monster ABRA A5 V13.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback