Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus KGP(M)E-D16 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory	123.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160616
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '21 at 01:40
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6212 21 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 52.7 1-Core 49.7 2-Core 96.6 40% 66.3 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 323 29% 245 Pts	64-Core 559 35% 559 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 143 124 143 111 122 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.1% Good	Read 250 Write 224 Mixed 205 SusWrite 133 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 35.1 117% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 113 94% 136 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 5GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 252 Write 232 Mixed 234 53% 239 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 36.6 120% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 131 103% 142 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 139GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 167 165 194 170 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.9% Good	Read 253 Write 229 Mixed 235 SusWrite 170 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 38.7 124% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 131 103% 142 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 28GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 168 153 79 50 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.4% Good	Read 255 Write 228 Mixed 233 SusWrite 129 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 38.4 124% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 129 101% 140 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 126%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2.5TB free Firmware: MEAOA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 120 120 118 121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 116 Write 115 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 119 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 66%
LSI Logical Volume 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3TB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 398 402 408 404 400 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
LSI Logical Volume 6TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 3.5TB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 7.3 17 8 117 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 20.6 Write 50 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 28.5 19% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0 17% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 121%
Toshiba USB2.0 Drive R00 250GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 198GB free, PID a000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 24.7 Write 24.7 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 20.7 30% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 126GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 117GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.3 8.6 13 15 15 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 23.6 Write 3.5 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 11.6 14% 12 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 2.6 186% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-070.A00LF 16x8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 16 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13.8 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 12.4 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 151 26% 151 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63201stBench 51%, 19 samples	2x
CPU: AMD Opteron 61721stBench 41%, 45 samples	1x
CPU: AMD Opteron 62121stBench 48%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
Neutron GTX 240GBCorsair $503Bench 81%, 3,421 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TBAMDBench 46%, 247 samples	1x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0-YK0 8x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 60 samples	1x
F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GBUnknownBench 41%, 13 samples	1x
TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N 16GBUnknownBench 23%, 4 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $503

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16