Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus KGP(M)E-D16 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory	121.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160616
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '21 at 04:26
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6212 21 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Memory 71.7 1-Core 38.6 2-Core 97 44% 69.1 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 346 30% 257 Pts	64-Core 566 35% 566 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 124 123 122 125 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36% Below average	Read 173 Write 200 Mixed 159 SusWrite 124 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 18.5 47% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 105 87% 126 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 83GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 126 125 125 126 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.6% Good	Read 251 Write 226 Mixed 222 SusWrite 126 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 36.8 119% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 126 100% 140 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 259GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 127 125 126 127 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.3% Good	Read 248 Write 176 Mixed 197 SusWrite 127 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 37.7 122% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 126 100% 139 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 52GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 126 125 124 126 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.2% Good	Read 248 Write 175 Mixed 193 SusWrite 126 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 37.4 122% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 124 99% 139 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 126%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: MEAOA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 107 105 107 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 108 Write 107 Mixed 61.1 SusWrite 107 70% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 66%
LSI Logical Volume 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 394 392 383 388 380 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
LSI Logical Volume 9TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 8.5TB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 475 452 453 467 444 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 46% Great: 62%
Toshiba USB2.0 Drive R00 250GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 198GB free, PID a000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 24.2 Write 24.7 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 14.2 28% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 126GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 117GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.2 9.4 12 7.4 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 23.8 Write 3.5 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 9.3 16% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.5 180% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-070.A00LF 16x8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 16 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 13.5 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 11.3 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63201stBench 51%, 19 samples	2x
CPU: AMD Opteron 61721stBench 41%, 45 samples	1x
CPU: AMD Opteron 62121stBench 48%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
Neutron GTX 240GBCorsair $503Bench 81%, 3,421 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TBAMDBench 46%, 247 samples	1x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $130Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0-YK0 8x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 60 samples	1x
F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GBUnknownBench 41%, 13 samples	1x
TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N 16GBUnknownBench 23%, 4 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $503

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16