ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G3-572 (all builds)
Motherboard	KBL Sienta_KLS
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170706
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '21 at 14:31
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 98.1 2-Core 220 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 543 57% 455 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 41.6 Parallax 39.3 31% 39.8 fps	MRender 39.4 Gravity 42.2 Splatting 27.7 29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 31%
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 118A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	5.73% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 7.1 Parallax 6.6 5% 6.67 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 10.1 7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.73% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GB 4,820 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK10D7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 101 32 17 22 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 420 Write 269 Mixed 276 SusWrite 39.9 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 29.8 126% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 12 DQ Mixed 24 47% 103 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 78%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 138GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 112 119 121 117 118 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 82.9 Write 64.3 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 114 59% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.8 194% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 79%
WD Elements 107C 3TB 3,265 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1.5TB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 34 35 35 35 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 29.6 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 33.9 40% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 04CB 16GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 21.7 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 23.4 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,063x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	348x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	762x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	447x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	202x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	345x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	182x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 4,820 samples	65x

RAM
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples	156x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	124x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 24,227 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback