Acer Predator PH317-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienna_KLS
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 10 '20 at 20:21
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 58
2-Core 109
48% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 195
21% 169 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1208) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6576
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 6.5
2% 12.1 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 5.73
Splatting 5.09
6% 7.02 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1207) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 35.9
32% 34.8 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 33.1
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 80 81 72 63 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 402
Write 132
Mixed 148
SusWrite 78.6
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 18
77% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 102
100% 161 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 70%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
579GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 92 103 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
62% Good
Read 116
Write 102
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 99.6
71% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
158% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 04CB 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH317-51 Builds (Compare 1,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback