Asus GL553VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL553VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJan 18 '21 at 22:29
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 87.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 212
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 566
61% 484 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 15E0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6109
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 38
Parallax 31.3
24% 33.1 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 11.5
20% 26.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1002 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 44 42 23 28 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 452
Write 215
Mixed 201
SusWrite 42.8
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 17.1
84% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 188
164% 247 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 87%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
744GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 109 110 115 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 106
Write 96.4
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 112
61% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 20.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 69%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,991 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback