Asus GL553VD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL553VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 01:12
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 170
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 361
41% 321 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 15E0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6089
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 37.1
Parallax 29.9
24% 32.1 fps
MRender 34.7
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 19.7
22% 28.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1002 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 342
Write 299
Mixed 122
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 27.6
82% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 218
182% 265 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 87%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
840GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 98 99 99 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 124
Write 114
Mixed 26
SusWrite 94.9
65% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,991 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback