Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 09:31
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 205
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 681
62% 521 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
154% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 188
Parallax 102
175% 168 fps
MRender 250
Gravity 194
Splatting 144
154% 196 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 154%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,047
Write 1,880
Mixed 1,356
392% 1,761 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 54.3
177% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 733
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 661
480% 629 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
231GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 275 279 280 279 306 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 286
Mixed 314
SusWrite 300
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 39.1
133% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 229
209% 320 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
683GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 88.8
Write 94.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 96.3
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3466C19D4/16G KHX3466C16D4/16GX 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 27
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $667
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback