TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Apple iMac19,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac19,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-AA95B1DDAB278B95
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 17:08
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 303
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,104
102% 851 Pts
64-Core 1,253
78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Apple(106B 0195) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 80.8
50% 66.5 fps
MRender 57
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 41.2
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 48.1%
 Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PSSD T7 500GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 341 339 332 328 331 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 301
Write 338
Mixed 306
SusWrite 338
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 21.5
75% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 155
113% 145 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 62.1%
 Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4S266M.M16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 28
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 29.7
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 89% ↑
This bench: 89.7%
 Great: 90%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical iMac19,1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Apple iMac19,1

CPU
Core i5-8500Intel  $166Bench 82%, 43,089 samples99x
Core i9-9900KIntel  $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples67x
Core i5-9600KIntel  $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples61x
GPU
Radeon Pro 570XAMDBench 36%, 275 samples105x
Radeon Pro 580XAMDBench 49%, 378 samples103x
Radeon Pro 575XAMDBench 42%, 94 samples34x
SSD
SM1024L 1TBAppleBench 204%, 326 samples18x
SM0512L 500GBAppleBench 198%, 575 samples11x
SM0256L 251GBAppleBench 193%, 232 samples6x
RAM
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GBHynixBench 61%, 15,613 samples38x
Mac SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 4x16GBCorsairBench 90%, 27 samples10x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples9x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback