Acer Aspire TC-220

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-220  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-220
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 00:17
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 41.2
1-Core 52.4
2-Core 91.4
36% 61.7 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 145
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA 1457) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.7% Poor
Lighting 35
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 36.3
28% 36.6 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 25.8
26% 32.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 282 276 276 281 279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 343
Write 292
Mixed 245
SusWrite 280
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 26
100% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 180
149% 213 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 129%
Kesu USB 3.0 1TB
525GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 30 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 33.7
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 29.8
21% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
109% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 74%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 4.9 4.9 4 4.3 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
8.33% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 4.7
11% 11 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.8
97% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.33%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.7
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-220 Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback