PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Acer Aspire TC-220 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Acer Aspire TC-220 |
Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160426 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Jan 11 '21 at 00:17 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
32.6%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA 1457) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 282 276 276 281 279 MB/s
|
71.8%
Very good
|
|||
Kesu USB 3.0 1TB
525GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 30 31 31 31 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 4.9 4.9 4 4.3 4.6 MB/s
|
8.33%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
26.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 41%, 15,719 samples | 69x |
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 9x |
A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $130Bench 50%, 12,547 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 20x |
HD 7470AMDBench 2%, 14,835 samples | 9x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $80 |