Acer Aspire TC-220

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-220  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-220
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 00:31
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 47.2
1-Core 59.5
2-Core 92.5
40% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 174
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA 1457) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 35.9
Reflection 38.8
Parallax 37.1
29% 37.3 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 26.4
26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 301 301 302 296 290 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 347
Write 314
Mixed 246
SusWrite 298
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 28.9
117% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 179
151% 221 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 129%
Kesu USB 3.0 1TB
525GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 34.6
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 30.7
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.2
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17%
Great: 74%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 4.8 4.9 4.8 3.9 4.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 3.2
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 4.3
12% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.8
101% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.7% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 13.5
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-220 Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback