Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190508
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '21 at 21:24
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 144 2-Core 288 96% 175 Pts	4-Core 593 8-Core 1,167 104% 880 Pts	64-Core 1,168 72% 1,168 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 116 Parallax 129 100% 122 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 121 Splatting 105 108% 136 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 154 65 27 34 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 411 Write 347 Mixed 181 SusWrite 80.2 56% 255 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 7.4 56% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 90 DQ Write 90.6 DQ Mixed 18.4 34% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 477GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 140 140 142 146 144 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 103 Write 130 Mixed 72 SusWrite 138 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 106%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 64GB 1,196 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 45GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 82 83 82 82 82 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 85.1 Write 76.5 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 79 101% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.9 249% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB 74,390 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 23 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 24.3 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2,336x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	686x
Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	357x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	1,311x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	535x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	326x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	999x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	209x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	185x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 14,178 samples	236x
DDR4 3000 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 4,421 samples	177x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	177x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $331

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16