MSI 870S-C45(FX) (MS-7715)

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7715
Motherboard	MSI 870S-C45(FX) (MS-7715) (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111121
Uptime	8.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '21 at 10:36
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	62% Good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 125 57% 91.5 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 349 35% 285 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	7.59% Terrible	Lighting 8.7 Reflection 14.9 Parallax 13.2 7% 12.3 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 9.6 Splatting 10.2 8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.59% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 93 102 106 49 6.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 386 Write 316 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 63.3 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 7 43% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 92%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 332GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 103 106 107 40 14 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 132 Write 122 Mixed 68 SusWrite 67.4 72% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB 10,673 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 382GB free Firmware: MS1OA650 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 126 133 130 128 145 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 136 Write 141 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 132 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 160C0 V3 Series000 1x8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.3% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 9.2 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 10 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870S-C45(FX) (MS-7715) Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870S-C45(FX) (MS-7715)

CPU
Phenom II X4 960TAMD $469Bench 54%, 4,461 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	1x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples	1x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	1x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	1x
9905403-442.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,854 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $497

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16