Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '21 at 17:50
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 252
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 630
68% 540 Pts
64-Core 683
42% 683 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,515
Write 1,605
Mixed 1,240
325% 1,453 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 69.8
251% 94.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,191
DQ Write 938
DQ Mixed 948
741% 1,026 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
87GB free
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 147 110 126 131 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 447
Write 251
Mixed 326
SusWrite 163
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 16.6
61% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 34.1
47% 86.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
262GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 112 109 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 118
Write 105
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 112
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 13 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 89
Write 25.4
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 13.6
43% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3
187% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 Adata DDR4 3000 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
79.1% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 30
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 28.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback