MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 14:12
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 111
2-Core 205
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 430
57% 426 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
ASRock(1849 5026) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.9% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 72.9
48% 65.1 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 57.7
Splatting 53.5
47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 57 126 58 129 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.6% Below average
Read 251
Write 108
Mixed 124
SusWrite 91.1
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 6.7
70% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 99.5
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 75.7
62% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 102%
Maxtor STM3160815AS 160GB
82GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 62 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 58.7
Write 27.7
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 59.2
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 Adata DDR4 3000 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
98% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 32.7
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 26.3
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback